- Eye on Money: Stock Market and Syria
- Syria accepts Russian proposal to surrender control of chemical weapons
- Local Expert: Syria must be monitored
- Quotes from President Obama's address on Syria situation
- White House tries to gain support for Syria strike
- Round 2 of Syria debate
- How international law applies to crisis in Syria
- Local representatives weigh in on Syria
- Local expert talks about Syria
- UN weapons inspectors prepare to leave Syria
- NATO chief: No plans for alliance action in Syria
- Closer to confrontation with Syria
- Money investing in light of crisis in Syria
- Obama: Only missiles, no US troops will be deployed if strike ordered on Syria
- UN envoy to Syria says chemical 'substance' used
- Details on crisis in Syria
- US lays groundwork for possible Syria strike
- Syria's effect on financial markets
- Rep. Chris Gibson discusses Syria
- Local man hopes for peace in Syria
- Expert weighs in on Syria's impact on US
- UN inspectors in Syria
- Top lawmakers call for military response in Syria
- US forces move closer to Syria as options weighed
- US could attack Syria
US could attack Syria
Updated: Saturday, September 7 2013, 11:26 AM EDT
ALBANY -- Weighing military options. The crisis in Syria continues to escalate and our government, along with our allies in Europe, may soon deliver its most aggressive response since Syria's first civil war broke out two years ago.
Four US warships are now positioned in the eastern part of the Mediterranian Sea, ready to launch missles likely aimed at Syrian military targets.
The White House says today that there is no question Syria's president, Bashir Assad, was responsible for last week's alleged gas attack on citizens.
The UN has yet to confirm that suspicion, and says investigators are still on the ground looking for evidence. However, the US is not waiting for their findings.
The concern now for our government and the people it serves: how can we be impacted by trouble half a world away? That trouble lies somewhere between the government, rebel forces, and ordinary citizens.
When asked if there was any easy way to sum up the history of how the conflict began, Rick Mathews, Director of the National Center for Security & Preparedness at the Rockefeller College at UAlbany said, "there really isn't. It's been going on for as long as we can remember."
But, the people of Syria are caught in the middle like never before with fears and tensions at a boiling point.
When asked what he see as the United States' possible involvement, Mathews said, "some people will tell you in most conflicts -- if everyone's upset you're doing a pretty good job. The United States has obviously been watching this closely has been everyhwere they can trying to influence peacefully, diplomatically, actions there."
That could mean military deployment. The United States is weighing options after an alleged chemical attack, believed to be orchestrated by the regime in power.
"We've shown that our technology, our ability to hit the x -- hit a target -- from a distance using cruise missiles and so forth has been very effective," Mathews said.
Syrians in the Capital Region we spoke with are begging the United States to help peacefully. Opinion of others is split on the use of force.
"I just can't imagine anybody that would want to put boots on the ground," said Joe Flynn from Voorheesville. "We've made some horrible mistakes."
"We should be putting pressure on the UN for whatever good it might do us but we should not unilaterally go in to Syria," said Marcia Heffron.
"If they can fix the problem, then yes," said Deepak Bandey of Albany. "But, it doesn't seem like a problem that can be fixed easily."
Great Britain is considering an intervention in Syria. That is hinged on the alleged chemical attack carried out by the government. Rebels are not without accusations for other deadly incidents, either.
As for any kind of retaliation from supporters of the syrian government -- Mathews believes it's a valid concern to keep in mind.